The known AI image generator called Reve Image 1.0 is trying to make a name in a text-image space, and can surpass existing tools such as Midjuni, Flux and Idem.
The CODENAMIL “HALFMOON”, the ReVe Image 1.0 model works on the credit -based system.
The user receives 100 free credit to test the service after signing up and offers additional credit for $ 500 for 500 households. Compared to options such as Midjourney or IDEOGRAM, it is cheaper at a low price at a low price.
Reve is good at rapid compliance, visual aesthetics and typography processing. This model produces high resolution images in a variety of artistic styles, from photo rendering to abstract art.
There are few known information on the legal complexity of models, architectures, teams and services.
However, if it is created using a free plan, it gives users’ ownership to the generated content, unlike the ‘owned’ Ricklot that “owns” the user’s output.
Reve’s team did not immediately respond to the request.
The company recently created a Github account, but did not upload the content. Some users on the Discord server speculate that there may be open source contributions, but that information has not been confirmed.
The idea of giving love to the open source community may not be far until you give up the comfyui ‘S’ S, a famous UI that runs the open source AI image generator today.
Our review: Practice test results
Overall quality evaluation
Prompt: Advanced office space with other journalism elements such as laptops, telephones, libraries and vintage typewriters, market prices and mechanical keyboards. The text elements are arranged vertically from top to bottom and read “Decrypt”, “Emerge”, “Degen Alley”, “Scene”, “GG”, “MyRiad Markets” and “Dastan”. In the minimalist room, there are clean lines, metal surfaces and surrounding lights, which cross the workspace to exhaust soft light, while sophisticated furniture and surrounding technical equipment are seen. A wide -angle photo with dramatic lighting that emphasizes neon elements on the surface of the minimalist.
In the comparison test, Reve has a continuous impressive result in various prompt types. We have tested three major aspects of providing the same weight of rapid compliance, realism and text production.
Reve has created an image with a balanced lighting, an accurate expression of the requested elements, and a vivid multicolored signboard.
The white walls were rendered properly and the journalism elements of the desk were naturally arranged.
When comparing directly with freeepik mystic (best bidding source models with text functions) and IDEOGRAM (the best bidding source model with text functions), in the same prompt, Reve has achieved excellent entire requirements that provide the best images when considering all aspects.
FREEPIK has been in color rating and light interactions, but it was difficult to have texture realism and text placement, but Idemo captured the glossy surface exactly, but the text element was the most realistic and not the most realistic.
Winners: Reve
Illustration function
Prompt: Detailed hands depicts a huge black spider with a bridge and a brilliant eye that pursues a woman screaming through a dark jungle environment. A woman in a torn white dress escapes from the spider through the thick tree stems covered with vine. Dense autumn leaves surround the scene, and the twisted branches and large leaves block most faint moonlight filtering from above. On the jungle floor is scattered with fallen leaves and roots. Black and white pen illustrations with rough sketch lines and dark cross hatching create deep shadows and textures.
We have tested a horror illustration test comparing ReVE for the output of SD3, SDXL, Midjourney and the votes.
All models worked to create a scene where women who fled from a huge spider in the forest environment.
Reve’s output shows the quality of the hand with detailed linework, powerful configuration frames, persuasive facial expressions and natural forest elements with appropriate depth.
Each competitor showed distinct strengths such as the jungle setting of SD3.5, the size of the SDXL, the atmospheric quality of Mid Juni, and the color of the marker, but REVE’s illustration met a prompt requirement with excellent details and artistic execution.
This is difficult to evaluate, but overall, ReVE appears to be equivalent to SD3.5. Hand -drawn aesthetics are characterized by sophisticated texture and hatching technology, and the horror elements were effectively delivered through spider threats and women’s terrible expressions.
The forest environment is cohesive and natural, and the technical execution is to showcase skilled perspectives, anatomy and configuration frames.
Tie: Reve and SD3.5
Content restriction
During the test, we found that REVE was actually enriched but implemented content filtering that affects certain outputs.
The model seems to understand the concepts related to excessive exposure and violence, but it appears to be pixeled in the final output after generation.
This is probably a big difference because it opens the door for the future method that provides anhydrous output in the high -top plan.
Censored models cannot create certain images. On the other hand, the filtered model was actually trained and understood the concept, but restricts the output according to a specific standard.
For users who need unlimited content creation, local installation of models such as Flux or SD3.5 will be more suitable.
Image Edition:
Unlike most image generators featuring inpaint/outpaint editing tools, ReVE relies on guidelines that understand natural language similar to Google approach with Gemini.
For example, the model is instructed to change the picture of the sunlight scene to the night scene, and then the result is as follows.
Instead of selecting the area and using the prompt, instead of obtaining the desired results, the user should “chat” with the model instead and write the expected results in the text box and do it for the best.
This is good for beginners who are interacting with the model and just trying to work. However, experienced users who need segmentation can be seen in great additions, but they are not enough to provide appropriate results.
It is better than Google’s AI because it does not decrease the image after a new generation, but changes the overall aesthetics that may not be ideal for users who need a model that respects character consistency.
conclusion
ReVe Image Generator is a good item in the AI image creation market, which is becoming more and more competitive.
In a variety of visual styles, they are very good at rapid compliance, realistic rendering and diversity.
It has become the best proximity source image generation for those who want to pay money to make a good image by weakening many competitors to $ 5 (effectively 1 %per centr) for 500 credits.
The flat price set model adds transparency that many users can understand. All images pay exactly one credit cost, regardless of complexity or resolution.
But there are some restrictions. Lack of editing functions among competitors is not a big problem for beginner users, but can frustrate the experienced lovers to improve the results.
Lack of mobile apps limits accessibility for use on the go, and limited information on teams and technologies behind REVE can be inconvenient for those who are interested in long -term support and data processing practices.
Nevertheless, for users who want to generate high quality images without a wide range of rapid engineering expertise, ReVE offers accessible and cost -effective alternatives for more established services. Multi -purpose and powerful rapid compliance is especially valuable for users with certain visual requirements.
SEBASTIAN SINCLAIR and JOSH Quittner were edited
In general, it is intelligent newsletter
A weekly AI trip by GEN, a creation AI model.
