The op_eturn limit of Bitcoin Core divides the encryption community.
Bitcoin Core is known to have planned a long op_eturn limit.
The upcoming release will basically lift the 80 -byte ceiling, which has previously limited data limited data, and deploy the change as a modernization of the policy as a response to the movement network practices.
op_return
Originally introduced as a soft -suppressor, Op_RETURN has allowed the UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) set to include small and unproven data without taunting. The limit aimed to enable legal use cases such as time stamping or encryption agreements while preventing abuse.
But the cap has been increasingly inefficient. Developers, including GREG “Instagibbs” Sanders, argued that the determined actors bypassed the restrictions through an opaque alternative that weakened network health.
In the public statement, Sanders pointed out that “large data inscriptions are taking place.”
Policy shifts of Bitcoin Core eliminate what is considered an old and unproductive rules internally. Pull Requests #32359 and #32406 formalized the changes and the latter did not use the “-Datacariersize” parameter.
This movement is more closely consistent with the way the operation of the core already works. Unlike the agreement rules that manage the contents that can be included in the block, standard rules such as Op_RETURN CAP usually determine how the transaction is delivered in the P2P network.
Op_RETURN limit removal
Therefore, removing the ceiling does not force the agreement, but re -adjusts the policy according to the actual conditions.
Nevertheless, criticism was vocal. Some prominent figures believe that this decision weakens the minimalist spirit of Bitcoin. Luke Dashjr, the manager of Bitcoin Knots, an increasingly popular alternative client, which accounts for almost 5%of the node, explained the removal as “complete madness.”
JAN3’s CEO and bold Bitcoin advocate, Samson MOW, suggested that the operator who wants to refuse to change can do so by executing a knot or maintaining the previous version of Bitcoin Core.
Maintaining a strict relay policy per MOW is essential to preserve the role of Bitcoin as a currency network for global censorship.
But MOW mentioned that it has the advantage of removing the limit practically.
“CAP. Delete. Sort basic policies with actual network practice and minimize incentives for harmful solutions and simplify relay paths.
Options 3 is probably unanimately unanimately received. The opposing parties can modify software, run strict policies, or propose new resources restrictions if empirical damage occurs. ”
Supporters believe that policy rules should not pursue the general miners’ behavior and that users should not pursue it as “harmful solutions.”
They argue that the block is still exaggerated with the unexpected data spam if the block is still maintained according to 4 million % by weight, dust limit and other constraints.
Removing any barrier makes the relay and commission estimation more predictable, and instead of misuse a script path that can be spent on inscriptions, it is incomprehensible with an unproven op_eturn output to encourage cleaner data.
op_eturn vs op_cat
Op_RETURN policy moves in line with the increase in propulsion for more ambitious protocol upgrades. The opcode, which is once used for BIP-347’s OP_SUCCESS126, was carried out with serious consideration in the MEME state.
The op_cat supported by developers and industry research enables the contract to allow conditional expenditures and advanced scripting without damaging the core rules of Bitcoin.
Galaxy Digital’s research team has placed OP_CAT and OP_CTV with a simple improvement in the main impact on challenging applications such as bridges and vaults. As discussions on the activation paths proceed, the trajectory of OP_CAT suggests that Bitcoin’s programming can soon expand.
This change shows a deeper tension on the identity of Bitcoin.
Those who support more allowed data policies reflect the reality of evolution, use and miner preference.
Critics argue that there is a risk of diluting the financial purity of Bitcoin and opening the door of whole chain confusion that can reduce performance over time. Bitcoin’s distributed governance ensures that a single path is not challenged.
The node operator maintains the ability to implement strict standards through alternative implementation such as Bitcoin Knots, while developers are cautious about adjusting consensus levels without clear support.
Removing the op_eturn limit will display policy reorganization rather than consensus. However, as programming possibilities, scalability and philosophical priorities converge in the new discussion stage, it affects a wide range of discussions that can form the direction of Bitcoin to 2026.
Since the removal of the op_eturn cap is closer to realization, the price of Bitcoin has been steadily maintained at about $ 94,300.
