Who is Satoshi? Benjamin Wallace goes down the rabbit hole of a new book.

Who made Bitcoin?

16 years ago, on the 2008 Halloween day, a company named Satoto Naga sent a white paper to the CypherPunk e -mail list for the peer -to -peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin was soon released. It quickly gave birth to the World Culture Movement and billions of dollars.

Benjamin Wallace wrote in November 2011 on a wired phenomenon and made one of the first mainstream journalists dealing with encryption spaces. At that time, no one knew Nakamoto’s identity, and despite strong efforts, Wallis could not figure it out.

Interestingly, the author of “Billion Beauty Vinegar: The Mystery of the World’s Expensive Wine Bottle” (2009) fell into mystery in 2022 after receiving an ongoing email from an absolute-conviction-Tesla employee in 2022. Wallace keeps clearly about the specific theory, but offers his discovery in the mysterious Sea Nakamoto, a 342 -page survey set on March 18.

Read more: Marc Hochstein -Satoshi Nakamoto: (perhaps) The mystery that will never be solved

conclusion? Well, in the end, Wallace must admit that he could not resolve Nakamoto mystery once again. However, his obsession has been a special emphasis on Cypherpunk, which contributed to the birth of cryptocurrency, and has brought about a thoughtful investigation into Bitcoin’s history. “Mysterious Mr. Nakamoto ”is a perfect work for cryptocurrency soldiers and beginners who want to know more about Bitcoin’s origin. In that sense, it can be compared with Laura Shin’s “Cryptopians: Creation of Idealism, Greed, Lies, and the first largest cryptocurrency craze” (2022).

Wallace mixes a list of long suspects throughout the book. His favorite one is HAL FINNEY, who won the first bitcoin transaction; Nick Szabo, who designed digital currency in the 1990s, is called “Bit Gold”. Len Sassaman, one of the main developers and operators of the Mixmaster Remailer; Relatively ambiguous Cypherpunk James A. Donald; Bitcoin critics Ben Lori for a long time.

“Mysterious Mr. One of the creating Nakamoto‘ The interesting read is that you can see the Wallis Guy’s names and go back and forth. Every time he narrows him, new information enters and explodes his theory. Wallace deserves credit for a multifaceted approach to his case. He uses abundant style measurements in Nakamoto’s emails and code, investigates the evidence, interviews almost all potential candidates, and learns how to learn code to get a better understanding of what Cypherpunks says.

Of course, coming to the investigation is the debate about whether Nakamoto’s identity is important from the beginning. Recently, HBO’s “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery” documentary (from last fall) and Vanec’s digital asset officer Matthew Sigel in February said that Twitter co -founder, Jack Dorsey, made Bitcoin. Vaneck’s digital asset officer, Vaneck, has been interested in this issue among the digital asset officers.

As Wallace pointed out, Nakamoto’s identity is one of the great secrets of the 21st century. As the Wall Street and the White House began to accept the encryption sector, it would be necessary to have a face in the Bitcoin inventor to make digital assets a little cleaner and safer.

Wallace is important because Nakamoto’s identity affects the way people see Bitcoin. He said that the encryption people prefer to think of Satoshi as a kind of prospects that emit Bitcoin as a gift to humanity before they disappear for a greater good good. But if Nakamoto is an obvious criminal like Paul Le Roux, Nagamoto is behind a bar, so why can’t you access a personal key? Will Blackrock and Fidelity still compete to encourage customers for exposure to cryptocurrency?

Wallace will eventually have Hal Finney in the creation of Bitcoin, but it is likely that he has not worked alone, and it is almost impossible to check any theory without providing unprecedented evidence without Nakamoto. But “Mysterious Mr. Nakamoto ”is intelligent and the lack of resolution does not feel half imminent. At the end of the day, it is about pursuit.

“What can you learn from Nakomoto’s electricity?” Wallace considered after suggesting that his friend would not answer at some point and that the story would be better. “Is he a random professor who had a lucky brainstorm? No, the most interesting thing in Na Kamoto was his absence. He was defined by what we Not so I know that. ”